Home > Shame!
Approval Ratings in Liberaland
OK, we Conservatives say that weíve solidified behind President Bush after he picked Sam Alito to replace Harriet Miers, who withdrew from Supreme Court consideration. The one peripheral indictment in the CIA leak case was not for outing Plame, and the prosecutor has strongly said that this case has nothing to do with the propriety of the war. Ben Bernanke is a solid home run of a Fed chairman pick. The stock market is up over 400 points in less than two weeks, on this news as well as solid economy numbers. The Presidentís approval rating should be up, but instead, the Washington Post, Zogby and AP/Ipsos report that it is down. How is that possible? Dirty tricks.
Rush Limbaugh, our fact exposing hero, has done it yet again. It seems that the pollsters have intentionally skewed the polls by oversampling Democrats and undersampling Republicans. This is not the first time that they have done this kind of ribald fact manipulation. Remember the 2004 election exit polls? Remember Susan Estrich crowing, "Either every exit poll I have seen is wrong or George Bush Loses" to Brit Hume on election night? I sure do!
That time, the Left tried, in knowing violation of election laws, to steal the presidency from the American People. Their exit polls were intentionally skewed 60% female and 90% urban! Urban voters and women tend to vote more Democratic. The result was that every exit poll showed a Kerry landslide. In reality, Our President secured the largest vote that any Presidential candidate ever received. The exit pollstersí effort to cause the networks to deflate Western GOP voters with their intentional lies, and thus swing the election to the America-hating Democrats failed -- miserably. We even added seats in both houses of Congress.
"So how did AP, Zogby and the Post intentionally tank our Presidentís approval rating? Exactly the same way that the 2004 exit pollsters tried to steal the Presidency. They undersampled Republicans and oversampled Democrats."
So how did AP, Zogby and the Post intentionally tank our Presidentís approval rating? Exactly the same way that the 2004 exit pollsters tried to steal the Presidency. They undersampled Republicans and oversampled Democrats. Their own background shows that the poll covers far fewer Republicans than Dems, notwithstanding other, reliable polls that show that far more Americans identify as Republican rather than Democratic. Of course our President, who is violently hated by Democrats, would poll way low.
The Left has lost all sense of conscience (I dare not use the word morality with these people). They will stop at nothing. Harry Reidís stunt, while silly and non-productive, at least was not illegal. One could argue that the 2004 exit poll fixing was attempted treason. The mainstream media senses the massive tide of public opinion shifting in our favor. They are Leftists, and they care nothing for the truth anyway, so they step in. With the same kind of honesty that caused Dan Rather to go on TV with poorly forged documents about our Presidentís National Guard service, C-BS and the AP ordered up an approval rating poll and made sure that Republicans were oversampled. Again, they seek to deflate our airship of support before we can get aloft.
"Luckily for us, the media is not taken as seriously as it used to be. I guess the people get sick and tired of finding out that this story or that story was made up or enhanced."
Luckily for us, the media is not taken as seriously as it used to be. I guess the people get sick and tired of finding out that this story or that story was made up or enhanced. Like the New York Timesí "selective editing" of a fallen war heroís letter to his girlfriend. In that sick episode, the letter was edited in order to remove out the words that Corporal Jeffrey B. Starr, the fallen hero, wrote that supports the war. The end result made this unmitigated, dedicated, loyal war hero look like a demoralized prisoner of a bad choice to enlist. The author of this travesty refuses to consider that his edits made a dishonest piece of his article.
So, to the Leftists, the goal is to get the power that they have lost back, no matter what it takes. See, Liberals believe that they are entitled to absolute power. They believe that their agenda, and only their agenda, is correct. The people who reject their philosophy are "stupid," "dumb," "evil," or any of the number of sickeningly offensive epithets that these snobs toss as us who live in, to use the Liberalsí own term, "Dumbf*ckistan" [asterisk by me]. Because, in their own world, everyone not a liberal is a moron, lying to us morons is nothing to them. So to fake up a bad approval rating is, to these people, harmless. After all, the Left has made it clear that nothing will stop them from seizing power again. Not the lawfully elected government, not the Constitution, not the laws, not the blogosphere, not Rush or Hannity or Laura Ingraham or anyone else.
"Liberals have no agenda except to gain power. They have no belief set except that they feel entitled to absolute, complete, unquestioned power."
Liberals have no agenda except to gain power. They have no belief set except that they feel entitled to absolute, complete, unquestioned power. Everything that they do is designed to further their goal of total power. Do you actually think that snobs that refer to every state that did not vote for Kerry in 2004 as "Jesusland" (meant as an epithet) and "Dumbf*ckistan" actually care about the people? Ha! Do you think that these people who call Michelle Malkin "gook" and Condoleezza Rice "House N*gga" -- because they have a different perspective on how things should be -- are actually "tolerant?" I just got my copy of Michelleís book, Unhinged. The section that reprints a small portion of her hate mail is truly shocking. Any of you who read Michelleís wonderful blog know that she never lies; she backs up everything with Stone Cold Hard Facts. As one hate mail person said, showing the Leftís true philosophy, she shouldnít have any right to express any opinion.
Everyone thought that Ann Coulter was joking when she said that the 2004 election was about the survival of the Republic. Ann was and is right. Sometimes I wonder if, in the event that the Left gains power again, we will have any more elections. These people simply cannot tolerate disagreement, much less criticism. Their only response to anything less than total fealty to their statements is to viciously attack. It saddens and scares me. It makes me more determined to vote the Left out of office every time I have the chance. And it should do so to you.
If one takes the 37% approval rating, and adjusts the skewed polls to match the demographics of the country, the approval rating is higher than 50%. Now someone needs to take a non-skewed poll and validate my results. Fox -- are you listening?
These America haters are indicted into our Hall of Shame.